DeepSeek V3 Series Model Release Overview and Testing
Key Upgrade Highlights
DeepSeek’s new V3 series includes two versions:
- V3.1: Production-ready stable version
- V3.2-Exp: Cutting-edge experimental version
Major improvements:
✅ Reasoning: 9.3 point increase on GPQA benchmark
✅ Code Generation: Optimized for web/game frontend development
✅ Chinese Processing: Significant enhancement in long-form writing quality
✅ Function Calling: Improved API interaction reliability
Technical Specifications:
- 685B parameter mixture-of-experts model
- 128K context window
- MIT open-source license
Reasoning Capability Tests
Test Case 1: 7-digit Safe Combination
Problem:
Sroan has a private safe with a 7-digit combination using distinct numbers.
Guess #1: 9062437
Guess #2: 8593624
Guess #3: 4286915
Guess #4: 3450982
Hint: Each guess has exactly two non-adjacent digits completely correct (both digit and position)
Results:
- V3.1: Incorrect reasoning ❌
- V3.2-Exp: Correct answer ✅ (Solution: 4053927)
Test Case 2: 8-digit Safe Combination (Enhanced)
Problem:
Now using 8 distinct digits:
Guess #1: 42617895
Guess #2: 05379821
Guess #3: 27358014
Guess #4: 34567902
Same hint conditions apply
Results:
- V3.1: Incorrect reasoning ❌
- V3.2-Exp: Still couldn’t solve ❌
- Multiple valid solutions exist (e.g. 45678912, 02368975)
Interesting Finding: SOTA-AI’s Early Model Combination Performance
SOTA-AI platform experiments showed that using DeepSeek-R1-0528’s reasoning_content output as input for DeepSeek-V3-0324 (when reasoning and instruction models were separate) demonstrated remarkable synergy:
🔍 Combination Test Results:
- 7-digit test: Perfect accuracy ✅
- 8-digit test: Successfully found multiple valid solutions ✅
- Example output:
"Through elimination, possible combinations include 45678912 or 02368975"
- Example output:
- Original article
💡 Technical Principle:
- R1 model generates detailed reasoning steps
- V3 model makes final judgments based on these steps
- This “step-by-step reasoning + comprehensive judgment” approach effectively overcomes single-model limitations
Conclusion
- DeepSeek V3.2-Exp outperforms V3.1 on basic reasoning tasks
- More complex 8-digit problems require:
- Longer reasoning chains
- Or innovative architecture designs (like third-party model combinations)
- Looking forward to continued optimization in complex logical reasoning
Tip: These combination lock problems effectively test AI reasoning capabilities through elimination and logical chain construction. Third-party model combinations provide valuable reference for architecture optimization.
Technical Evaluation & Decision: Platform Not Upgrading to V3.2-Exp
Based on SOTA-AI platform testing data, we’re keeping production on current versions despite V3.2-Exp’s 40% lower API costs. Key technical considerations:
Core Issue: UE8M0 FP8 Format’s Radical Design
-
Precision Loss Risk
- Uses “8-bit exponent (E8) + 0-bit mantissa (M0)” pure exponential encoding
- Unstable performance on precision-sensitive tasks like semantic understanding
- Example: Higher error rate than R1 on “校服上别别别的” polysemy parsing
-
Reasoning Quality Tradeoff
- Hybrid reasoning modes (Think/Non-Think) show benchmark performance drops
- Similar Qwen research suggests flexible mode switching may reduce quality
Performance Comparison
Test Item | R1-0528 | V3.2-Exp | Analysis |
---|---|---|---|
Semantic Accuracy | 92% | 85% | UE8M0 unfriendly to semantic encoding |
Reasoning Latency | 320ms | 210ms | FP8 computational efficiency advantage |
Long-text Coherence | 4.8/5 | 4.2/5 | Missing mantissa affects context modeling |
Final Decision Factors
- Quality First Principle
- Current R1+V3 combination maintains 98.3% accuracy in key scenarios
- Cost-Benefit Analysis
- While V3.2-Exp API is 40% cheaper, error handling costs rise 60%
- Technical Maturity
- Awaiting UE8M0 e8m2 improved version (expected 2025Q4)
Note: This decision applies specifically to SOTA-AI’s use cases. Other applications may require different tradeoffs. We’ll continue monitoring V3.3 improvements.